False-memory partisans sometimes grant the existence of recovered-memory cases involving a single instance of abuse, which they might then explain away as “normal forgetting” (although, of course, there is nothing “normal” about forgetting abuse). But there is a seemingly unshakable belief among those promoting “false memory syndrome” that repeated abuse would never be banished from memory. A documented case from Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse in Australia challenges this belief. Philippe Vincent Trutmann, who was sentenced to 6 1/2 years in prison in 2005, “admitted to sexually abusing [Luke Benson] 30 to 40 times over a two-year period.” But Mr. Benson, who remembers Trutmann as a “father figure,” has no recollection of the abuse, as indicated in this story.
top of page
Related Posts
See AllMichael Salter just wrote an important thread on Twitter about historical inaccuracies that keep getting repeated about child abuse and therapy. Click below and it will take you there. The thread is
From an important new article in the Guardian by Michael Salter: [S]cientific studies find that children are far less suggestible than we have been led to believe. Brain imaging studies have identifie
bottom of page